This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

IED en los países del MERCOSUR: ganadores y perdedores en los acuerdos ALCA y UE-MERCOSUR

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Gustavo Bittencourt () (Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República)
Rosario Domingo () (Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República)
Nicolás Reig () (Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze some additional issues related to foreign direct investment (FDI) and to the development of regional integration agreements (RIA).Firstly, we include additional variables to those that are generally considered in the gravity models of FDI determinants (they are related to the external sector and to the relative size of economies that are involved in each bilateral elationship).Secondly, the analysis of “winners” and “losers” is disaggregated at country level (in terms of total received FDI), with the purpose to consider possible effects of agreements on each MERCOSUR country in the frame work of ALCA and MERCOSUR-EU. The form that FDI among countries adopts allows us to profile winners and losers related to FDI flows in the framework of regional integration agreements. FDI increase could be associated to external creation of FDI. At the same time it is observed a greater elasticity of bilateral FDI flows related to foreign trade. If ALCA and MERCOSUR-EU agreements would increase trade flows –as is foreseeable- those flows would have a positive impact on FDI flows, and predominant forms of expansion would be open/resource seeking forms. In this framework and in relation to its potential to capture FDI, Brazil would be the only “winner” inside the bloc and Argentina would be probably the “loser”. In small economies Uruguay is near to be a “winner” and Paraguay a “loser”.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://decon.edu.uy/publica/2006/0206%20english.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Department of Economics - dECON in its series Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) with number 0206.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 34 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ude:wpaper:0206

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Constituyente 1502, 6to piso, CP 11200, Montevideo
Phone: (598 2) 410-6449
Fax: (598 2) 410-6450
Email:
Web page: http://www.decon.edu.uy/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Carmen Estrades) or (Héctor Pastori).

Related research
Keywords: Foreign Direct Investment; Economic Integration; Multinational Enterprises.;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
F2 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business
F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All bibliographic data on IDEAS has been put in the public domain by the publishers.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-9.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.