IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucl/cepeob/19.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lockdown Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Carl Cullinane

    (The Sutton Trust)

  • Jake Anders

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

  • Alice De Gennaro

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

  • Erin Early

    (Queen's University, Belfast)

  • Erica Holt-White

    (The Sutton Trust)

  • Rebecca Montacute

    (The Sutton Trust)

  • Xin Shao

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy & Equalising Opportunities)

  • James Yarde

    (The Sutton Trust)

Abstract

There were substantial gaps between state and private secondary schools in the intensity of remote learning during the first lockdown in 2020, with the private sector much better placed to adapt quickly. 96% of independent school pupils had live online lessons in the first lockdown, compared to 65% of state school pupils. While state sector provision improved in the second period of school closures in early 2021, inequalities opened up within the state sector. Grammar schools (96%) and comprehensive schools with more affluent intakes (95%) caught up the most, compared to 80% at schools with the most deprived intakes. Barriers to remote learning – such as lack of access to a suitable device for learning or sharing a device, lack of a quiet space in the home, lack of support from teachers or parents – were all more likely to be experienced by young people from lower socio-economic backgrounds, and those who experienced those barriers reported working fewer hours during lockdowns. Those without a device worked on average 8 hours per week in lockdown 1, those with just a mobile phone 10 hours, and those with a laptop or tablet 14 hours. While many pupils without suitable devices received support through school and government distribution programmes, over half (53%) of those who lacked a device at the beginning of the pandemic had still not received one by the end of the second period of school closures. Problems with internet access showed a different pattern, complicated by the fact that more intensive online learning was associated with more internet problems. Having internet issues was not associated with working fewer hours. Patterns by ethnicity and race were mixed. Overall there were few differences in the amount of time spent learning by ethnic background. While young people from Black and Asian backgrounds were more likely to receive tutoring and had parents more confident with support for learning, they were also more likely to need to share devices and less likely to have a quiet place to study.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl Cullinane & Jake Anders & Alice De Gennaro & Erin Early & Erica Holt-White & Rebecca Montacute & Xin Shao & James Yarde, 2022. "Lockdown Learning," CEPEO Briefing Note Series 19, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Oct 2022.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeob:19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-cepeo.ucl.ac.uk/cepeob/cepeobn19.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2022
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jake Anders & Lindsey Macmillan & Patrick Sturgis & Gill Wyness, 2021. "Inequalities in young peoples' educational experiences and wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic," CEPEO Working Paper Series 21-08, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Jul 2021.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erica Holt-White & Alice De Gennaro & Jake Anders & Carl Cullinane & Erin Early & Rebecca Montacute & Xin Shao & James Yarde, 2022. "Mental Health and Wellbeing," CEPEO Briefing Note Series 22, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Nov 2022.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    COVID-19; pandemic; remote education; lockdown; learning; secondary schools; GCSE;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeob:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Anders (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/epucluk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.