This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Dollarization: An Irreversible Decision

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Roger Craine.
Abstract

After faithfully maintaining a fixed exchange rate and fully convertible currency for almost a decade Argentina still pays higher interest rates on peso denominated debt than on US dollar denominated debt. The interest rate spread is the price of keeping the option to devalue alive. Argentina has sufficient foreign reserves to defend the currency against any attack, but they could choose to devalue if the pain of maintaining the currency peg got too great. Investors fear devaluation and they charge Argentina for the option to devalue. In 1999 President Menem recommended "dollarizing" the economy. Dollarization extinguishes the option to devalue. If dollarization is a credible commitment to maintain a fixed exchange rate, then it is an irreversible decision. This is the first paper, as far as I know, to explicitly model the unique feature -- irreversibility -- of a dollarization policy. In addition, it is the first paper to recognize that if a dollarization is a potential exchange rate regime choice, then the equilibrium is a mixed strategy equilibrium. Argentina might dollarize. I compute Nash equilibria and the transition probabilities that a country will move from a currency board regime to dollarizing, or floating, in one year, or two years, out to seven years. I model shocks to the exchange rate as a jump-diffusion process. The jumps represent large "asymmetric" shocks to the exchange rate -- such as Brazil's 1999 devaluation. The probability of dollarization is inversely related to the jump probability. When the jump probability is small, the probability of dollarization is large and the probability of floating is small. When the jump probability is large, the probability of floating is large and the probability of dollarization is small.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of California at Berkeley in its series Economics Working Papers with number E01-298.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 01 Mar 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ucb:calbwp:e01-298

Contact details of provider:
Postal: University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA
Phone: 510-642-0822
Fax: 510-642-6615
Email:
Web page: http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/iber/wps/econwp.html
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Postal: IBER, F502 Haas Building, University of California, Berkeley CA 94720-1922
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc also has a blog.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-31.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.