IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/trn/utwpem/2015-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bilateral netting and contagion dynamics in financial networks

Author

Listed:
  • Edoardo Gaffeo
  • Lucio gobbi

Abstract

The bilateral netting of mutual obligations is an institutional arrange- ment usually employed in payment systems to reduce settlement risks. In this paper we explore its advantages and pitfalls when applied to an inter- bank lending market, in which banks extend credit to nÃÉand borrow from nÃÉother banks to adjust their short-term liquidity needs. By recurring to computer simulations, we show that bilateral netting considerably reduce the potential for default cascades over an interbank network whenever the source of contagion is a negative shock to the assets of a randomly chosen bank. When the shock hits the liability side of the balance sheet nÃÉas a run on deposits nÃÉthe role of a bilateral netting agreement in mitigating the risk of a systemic liquidity crisis depends critically on the topological characteristics of the interbank network, however.

Suggested Citation

  • Edoardo Gaffeo & Lucio gobbi, 2015. "Bilateral netting and contagion dynamics in financial networks," DEM Discussion Papers 2015/02, Department of Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:trn:utwpem:2015/02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unitn.it/files/download/27419/dem2015_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morteza Alaeddini & Philippe Madiès & Paul J. Reaidy & Julie Dugdale, 2023. "Interbank money market concerns and actors’ strategies—A systematic review of 21st century literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 573-654, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bilateral netting; financial networks; contagion;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:trn:utwpem:2015/02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: roberto.gabriele@unitn.it (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detreit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.