IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/trn/utwpde/0709.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A framework for cut-off sampling in business survey design

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Bee
  • Roberto Benedetti
  • Giuseppe Espa

Abstract

In sampling theory the large concentration of the population with respect to most surveyed variables constitutes a problem which is difficult to tackle by means of classical tools. One possible solution is given by cut-off sampling, which explicitly prescribes to discard part of the population; in particular, if the population is composed by firms or establishments, the method results in the exclusion of the �smallest� firms. Whereas this sampling scheme is common among practitioners, its theoretical foundations tend to be considered weak, because the inclusion probability of some units is equal to zero. In this paper we propose a framework to justify cut-off sampling and to determine the census and cut-off thresholds. We use an estimation model which assumes as known the weight of the discarded units with respect to each variable; we compute the variance of the estimator and its bias, which is caused by violations of the aforementioned hypothesis. We develop an algorithm which minimizes the MSE as a function of multivariate auxiliary information at the population level. Considering the combinatorial optimization nature of the model, we resort to the theory of stochastic relaxation: in particular, we use the simulated annealing algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Bee & Roberto Benedetti & Giuseppe Espa, 2007. "A framework for cut-off sampling in business survey design," Department of Economics Working Papers 0709, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
  • Handle: RePEc:trn:utwpde:0709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unitn.it/files/9_07_bee.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raymond Chaudron & Krit Carlier, 2015. "The advantages of random sampling versus cutting-of-the-tail: the application of a stratified sample design for the collection of data on special financial institutions in the Netherlands," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Indicators to support monetary and financial stability analysis: data sources and statistical methodologies, volume 39, Bank for International Settlements.
    2. Orietta Luzi & Gianni Seri & Viviana De Giorgi & Giampiero Siesto, 2013. "Estimating Business Statistics by integrating administrative and survey data: an experimental study on small and medium enterprises," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 15(2-3), pages 31-50.
    3. Sandars, Patrick & Eleni, Starida & Nega, Stamatina & Casado, Antonio & Buzzi, Maria Rosaria & Stacchini, Massimiliano & Švedas, Tomas & Goes, Wim & Bartmann, Martin & Ciesla, Norbert & Maitland-Smith, 2013. "Quality measures in non-random sampling: MFI interest rate statistics," Statistics Paper Series 3, European Central Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cut-off sampling; skewed populations; model-based estimation; optimal stratification; simulated annealing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • D92 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Intertemporal Firm Choice, Investment, Capacity, and Financing
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:trn:utwpde:0709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Luciano Andreozzi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detreit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.