The paper's thesis is that the chief causes for the well-known `industrial crisis' of the traditional English textile towns during the period c.1290 - c.1340 was not the emergence of supposedly superior, lower-cost rural competition, as is generally supposed, but rather a far-reaching economic crisis that was afflicting their major cloth markets, those in the Mediterranean basin; and furthermore, that during this same era almost all of the textile towns, small and large, in northern France and the Low Countries were then experiencing an almost identical crisis. Most of these northern textile producers had been sending the bulk of their exports as price-takers', in the form of cheap, coarse, light, undifferentiated textiles, to the Mediterranean, where warm climates, mass urban markets, and -- during the 12th and 13th centuries -- low transaction costs had made such exports from north-west Europe profitable. From the 1290s, however, the entire Mediterranean basin and much of wester Europe were beset with incessant, spreading warfare, piracy, and political instability, which cumulatively led to rising taxes, transport, and marketing costs, while disrupting and contracting markets; by the 1320s transaction costs had risen to such a high level that northern producers could no longer profit from sending send cheap textiles over such long and hazardous routes to what had become saturated Mediterranean markets. For reasons explored elsewhere, by the 1340s, some Flemish and Brabantine towns had adjusted to this crisis by shifting production, as `price-makers', to very high-priced highly differentiated luxury woollens, which could better bear these rising transaction costs. From the 1360s, English cloth manufacturers pursued this same route, while enjoying a virtual monopoly on very high quality wools, and the protection of high export taxes on those wools to overseas competitors producing luxury woollens. In this era production from the now revived and expanding Englishcloth industry was in fact still much more urban than rural. The more pronounced though still gradual shift to rural cloth making took place in the following century, for reasons beyond the scope of this paper.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Toronto, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
munro-98-02.
Length: 64 pages Date of creation: 18 Jun 1998 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:tor:tecipa:munro-98-02
Contact details of provider: Postal: 150 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario Phone: (416) 978-5283 Fax: (416) 978-6713
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (RePEc Maintainer).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
Find related papers by JEL classification: N1 - Economic History - - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Growth and Fluctuations N6 - Economic History - - Manufacturing and Construction N7 - Economic History - - Economic History: Transport, International and Domestic Trade, Energy, and Other Services L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)