IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tky/jseres/97j12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

"A Note on the Theory of "Socialist Market Economy": @The Materialistic View of History in the Twilight"(in Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • Katsuji Nakagane

Abstract

It is widely recognized in China, and even among some western economists, that the experiment undergoing with a title of "socialist market economy" has put spurs to its economy with the result that it not only has saved socialism but its international status has been raised much higher. The theory of socialist market economy, which is called a creature by Deng Xiaoping, is highly praised in China as a great breakthrough of socialist economic theory. It is unique in that the market mechanism is utilized to a full extent while public ownership is still held as a basic property right system. On the other hand, this theory is criticized for having sacrificed some essence of Marxist original ideas of socialism, or having mixed unnaturally the two contradictory elements in economic system, i.e. market mechanism and public proprietorship. Originally, Marx and Lenin imagined that the socialism which must have appeared after capitalism had to be a system without market, but fully and easily planned by people, without the state as a classless society, and with much more freedom and democracy than in capitalism. This scenario was based on the well known proposition: historical development is determined by a law of dialectic materialism. Needless to say, this proposition proved to be unrealized. Particularly contrary to Marx's prophecy, the socialist revolutions occurred not in advanced capitalist countries, but in less developed areas like Russia and China. In practice, the state continued to exist, even more strengthened. The new class structure was created. The market, which was abolished at first, gradually replaced planning. However, this proposition is still definitely indispensable for socialist regimes, since the ideology-oriented communist party, can be authorized for its dictatorship in the political scene on the basis of this "scientifically true" theory of human history. The history of "real socialism" is a history of a gap between the theory and reality. As this gap becomes wider, however, the people are not motivated by socialist ideology. This ideology is being regarded just as hypocrisy. China's economy was developed because it reintroduced the market, rather than because it is socialist. No matter how it is rationalized along the line of Marxist theory, the socialist market system was the farthest form from the vision of socialism Marx and others had originally in mind. It may be a final testimony of the collapse of the materialistic view of history. In this paper, we briefly trace the historical development of socialist economic theory, from Marx to the East European reformers like Brus and Ota Sik, then the process of changing socialist economics in China since the early 1980's, and finally consider what weaknesses a socialist system has both in theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Katsuji Nakagane, 1997. ""A Note on the Theory of "Socialist Market Economy": @The Materialistic View of History in the Twilight"(in Japanese)," CIRJE J-Series 97-J-12, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
  • Handle: RePEc:tky:jseres:97j12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cirje.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research/dp/97/j12/contents.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tky:jseres:97j12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CIRJE administrative office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ritokjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.