Takashi Obinata (Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo)
Abstract
Two fictions are used in measuring accounting pension expenses. First, the periodical pension expenses are, not the results of allocation of firm's contributions, but the sum of the allocated costs of pension benefits to the employee and the realized returns (deduction from pension expenses) from pension assets in the period. In this stage, cashoutflows of contributions are divided into the outflows of pension benefits and the inflows of returns. Second, through discounting the future cash-flows in allocating pension benefits, the outflows of pension benefits are divided into the flow of 'service cost' and the flow of 'interest cost', and these fictitious flows are allocated over different periods and in the different pattern. The purpose of dividing the real flow into accounting fictitious flows is to set the accounting standard of measuring expenses that can be equally applied to both the corporate pension plans and the retirement money (TAISYOKUKIN) plans. In its background, the value judgement exists, that is: since the payments in the both plans means equally the cost of consumed labor services, accounting rules for two plans must, in the view of 'substance over form', be unified or integrated. However, because only one cash-flow can be observed empirically, the accounting measurement methods of dividing and making fictitious flows are inconsistent with the usual allocation rule, and those methods cannot be explained clearly from the view of the traditional accounting theory. Moreover, those methods unnecessarily bring about the meaningless confusion in accounting practice. This paper investigates the fictions in accounting measurement of pension expenses, and describes that those fictions are not the theoretical necessity. The result of this research is one of the evidence, that 'substance over form' has no 'meaningful substance'.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo in its series CIRJE J-Series with number
CIRJE-J-21.
Did you know? You can import bibliographic info in various formats into you bibliographic tool, or just into your word processor. See under "publisher info" on each abstract page.