This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The fiscal incidence of provision of free basic water

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Servaas van der Berg () (Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch)
Ada Jansen () (Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch)
Cobus Burger () (Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch)
Eldridge Moses () (Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch)
Hassan Essop () (Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

A policy of free basic services (water, sanitation and electricity) was introduced by the government in 2000 to provide basic services to households unable to afford these services. The policy allows for six kilolitres of water free monthly to all households, irrespective of household size or demographics. The assumption was that water consumption is relatively insensitive to the tariff structure, thus alternative tariff structures were applied to obtain the same amount of revenue for unchanged consumption. Aggregate costs of water consumption of R3.8 billion in 2006 by households with piped water were relatively small compared to social spending of about R177 billion. In comparison to a fixed price structure, the gains from the actual tariff structure were quite small for most households who benefited. The net gains of the poorest 40% of households of R61 million per year from the IBT plus Free Basic Water was quite small when compared to social spending of R88 billion to their benefit. The analysis illustrates the limitation of redistributive policies at municipal level. Those who gain are more often in the middle of the national income distribution, although they are the poorer members of the urban population.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ekon.sun.ac.za/wpapers/2009/wp112009/wp-11-2009.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: First version, 2009
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 11/2009.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sza:wpaper:wpapers83

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland
Phone: 021-8082247
Fax: +27 (0)21-808 2409
Email:
Web page: http://www.ekon.sun.ac.za
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Melt van Schoor).

Related research
Keywords: Publicly provided goods; National government expenditure;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Cannot find something on IDEAS? Encourage the publisher to index it! Instructions.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-3.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.