IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/syd/wpaper/2123-6744.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cantillon on Real Wages and Employment: a rational reconstruction of the significance of land utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Aspromourgos, Tony

Abstract

It is quite a fundamental proposition of Richard Cantillon's Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en General (1755) that employment and population bear a negative relation to the level of real subsistence wages - a form of wages (or subsistence) fund doctrine. This paper presents a 'rational reconstruction' of Cantillon's system and the relation between real wages and employment within it. It seeks thereby to clarify the difficulties in the way of this doctrine operating in a market economy constructed along Cantillonian lines - as opposed to a Cantillonian command economy. These results are contrasted with a model of Cantillon by Hans Brems.

Suggested Citation

  • Aspromourgos, Tony, 1995. "Cantillon on Real Wages and Employment: a rational reconstruction of the significance of land utilization," Working Papers 222, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:syd:wpaper:2123/6744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2123/6744
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans Brems, 1978. "Cantillon Versus Marx: The Land Theory and the Labor Theory of Value," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 669-678, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roy H Grieve, 2015. "Revisiting Cantillon's admirable theory of distribution and value - a misinterpretation corrected," Working Papers 1506, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:syd:wpaper:2123/6744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanessa Holcombe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deusyau.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.