IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/syb/wpbsba/2123-8171.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Portfolio Margining: Strategy vs Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Coffman, E.G. Jr
  • Matsypura, D.
  • Timkovsky, V.G.

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a novel mathematical and experimental analysis of two approaches to margining customer accounts, strategy-based and risk-based. Building combinatorial models of hedging mechanisms of these approaches, we show that the strategy-based approach is, at this point, the most appropriate one for margining security portfolios in customer margin accounts, while the risk-based approach can work efficiently for margining only index portfolios in customer mar-gin accounts and inventory portfolios of brokers. We also show that the application of the risk-based approach to security portfolios in customer margin accounts is very risky and can result in the pyramid of debt in the bullish market and the pyramid of loss in the bearish market. The results of this paper support the thesis that the use of the risk-based approach to margining customer accounts with positions in stocks and stock options since April 2007 influenced and triggered the U.S. stock market crash in October 2008. We also provide recommendations on ways to set appropriate margin requirements to help avoid such failures in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Coffman, E.G. Jr & Matsypura, D. & Timkovsky, V.G., 2010. "Portfolio Margining: Strategy vs Risk," Working Papers 03/2010, University of Sydney Business School, Discipline of Business Analytics.
  • Handle: RePEc:syb:wpbsba:2123/8171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2123/8171
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vera Barinova, 2012. "Institutional Conditions for Innovative Development of a Firm," Published Papers 170, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2013.
    2. Evgeny Gurevsky & Sergey Kovalev & Mikhail Y. Kovalyov, 2021. "Min-max controllable risk problems," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 93-101, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:syb:wpbsba:2123/8171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Artem Prokhorov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sbsydau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.