Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Formal competencies in the innovation systems of the Nordic countries: An analysis based on register data


Author Info


This report analyses to what extent register data on employees can be utilised to study stocks and flows of personnel in a national innovation systems perspective. The registers contain information on each single employee in the three countries in the study (Sweden, Norway and Finland), including information on their age, education and employment at any particular time. This information is used partly to compare stocks of employees with different types of education across industrial sectors, and partly to describe flows of personnel between sectors. In the sectoral breakdown a particular attention has been given to higher education institutions and research institutes. Whereas the analyses of stocks can be said to describe the nodes in the innovation systems, the flow analysis adds to our capability of establishing and describing the links in the systems. By adding in information on knowledge creation, such as information on innovative activity or expenditure for R&D, the methodology allows for tracking of knowledge flows within the innovation systems. So far, however, such additional information has not been taken into account.Although the experiences of the approach have revealed that this is a feasible and productive line of research to expand our knowledge about innovation systems, there are indeed methodological problems involved – even when comparing countries that are so alike as the Nordic ones. The problems mainly relate to differences in industrial structures and education systems, with the resulting problems of coding and updating of registers. Despite these problems we are confident that we have presented a reasonable picture of the comparative picture in the Nordic countries. At an overall level we find the same main structures in all three countries, but there are also clear differences in certain aspects. We refer to the concluding chapter 5 for details about the findings.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Nils Henrik Solum)
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy in its series STEP Report series with number 199806.

as in new window
Date of creation:
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:stp:stepre:1998r06

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Hammersborg torg 3, 0179 Oslo, Norway
Phone: +4722868010
Fax: +4722868049
Web page:
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:

Related research



No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Leiponen, Aija & Drejer, Ina, 2007. "What exactly are technological regimes?: Intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 1221-1238, October.
  2. Marianne Broch & Per M. Koch & Siri Aanstad, . "Nye virkemidler for innovasjon – hva gjøres i andre land?," STEP Report series 200209, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
  3. Anders Ekeland & et al., . "Mobility from the research sector in the Nordic countries," STEP Report series 200312, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
  4. Markus Bugge & Anders Ekeland, . "The mobility from the research sector – The Norwegian case 1987 – 2000," STEP Report series 200203, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
  5. Markku Virtaharju & Mikael Åkerblom, . "Measuring mobility – some methodological issues," STEP Report series 200313, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:stp:stepre:1998r06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nils Henrik Solum) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Nils Henrik Solum to update the entry or send us the correct address.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.