Author
Listed:
- Kate Bayliss
(Department of Economics, SOAS University of London)
- Jasmine Gideon
(Department of Geography, Birkbeck, University of London)
Abstract
The first few months of Covid 19 put immense strain on the provision of social care in the UK, as care homes initially bore the brunt of the pandemic. However, the care sector was already in crisis, significantly fragmented after three decades of privatisation, and underfunded following ten years of austerity. Yet, the impacts have been uneven, and a narrative of underfunding overlooks the inequalities generated by the structures that underpin provisioning. Most private care companies operate on a small scale and many are family-owned. But a growing share has been taken over by financial private equity investors, drawn to the secure revenue stream offered by an aging population, a significant share of government financing, and the scope to increase in size by acquiring smaller scale operations. Investors extract shareholder value in ways that are unrelated to productivity and which generate returns even when an operation may ostensibly be lossmaking. Methods of financial extraction include hiking up company debts, setting up complex property ownership arrangements, establishing corporate ownership in tax havens, alongside exploitative working practices. The care sector is labour intensive and the mainly female workforce, has long been undervalued. Most are paid less than the Real Living Wage and many are on zero-hour contracts. This paper shows that such structures of provisioning are inequitable across different dimensions. Shareholder returns are ultimately funded by tax payers and the personal savings of individuals, for whom social care is an essential service. High returns to offshore investors sit alongside poor working conditions for frontline staff. Processes of financialisation have transformed care services from a social need into a financial investment. This translates into new social relations where narratives are constructed in terms of markets and efficiency. Meanwhile, the underlying inequalities are overlooked and become normalised.
Suggested Citation
Kate Bayliss & Jasmine Gideon, 2020.
"The privatisation and financialisation of social care in the UK,"
Working Papers
238, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
Handle:
RePEc:soa:wpaper:238
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
Privatisation;
financialisation;
social care;
UK;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
- H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare
- I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
- I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:soa:wpaper:238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chandni Dwarkasing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desoauk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.