IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/scmowp/009at.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Relationship between Plagiarism and Morality

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Tulus

    (Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the following issue: plagiarism is considered to be an unethical behavior, and the perpetrators are to be sanctioned, including expulsion from their institution. Sometimes, we should admit, plagiarism is accidental. The ability to produce unique content without being plagiarized is like securing a software or biotechnology patent. A patent is the inventor’s method of protecting his intellectual property and livelihood. Copyright infringement is a violation of the rights of the copyright holder when the material whose use is restricted by copyright is used without consent. Acts of plagiarism are morally reprehensible because the rules of the codes of ethics for students, academics, writers and scholars are intentionally violated. In this case, it is important to note that most cases in which the act of plagiarism has been determined can be discussed as intentional, as people choose to copy the material as the fastest way to cope with the task. As a result of such activities, the idea of intellectual freedom is also taken into account. Therefore, it is possible to pay attention to the reasons for discussing the facts of stealing other people’s words and ideas as being morally wrong.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Tulus, 2020. "The Relationship between Plagiarism and Morality," Scientia Moralitas Conference Proceedings 009at, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:scmowp:009at
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scientiamoralitas.education/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/009AT.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    plagiarism; morality; moral values; deception; ethics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:scmowp:009at. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.