IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/raiswp/0290.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Historical References and Doctrinal Precedents of Forensic Science Worldwide

Author

Listed:
  • Nelu Dorinel Popa

    (Dimitrie Cantemir University of Targu Mures, Romania)

Abstract

Forensic science owes its origins to the people who developed the principles and techniques needed to identify and compare physical evidenceas, well as those who recognized the need to consolidate these principles into a coherent scientific discipline. Evidence of forensic science dates back to antiquity, but it was not until the 19th century that science was rigorously applied to criminal cases through advances in the way criminal cases were handled, which improved the validity of the conclusions drawn from investigations by the judicial authorities. Many steps have also been taken to organize specialist areas within police departments, including forensic science. Furthermore, forensic science has literary roots, as evidenced by the forensic novels written by famous authors, which were based on the methods, techniques and tactics used in forensic science. This article contains a brief analysis of some of the key moments and doctrinal precedents in the history of forensic science, seen in the evolution of its subfields. Such insights aim to provide readers with a deeper understanding of the current state and trends of this science.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelu Dorinel Popa, 2023. "Historical References and Doctrinal Precedents of Forensic Science Worldwide," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2023 0290, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/0290.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    forensic science; forensic medicine; genetics; dactyloscopy; ballistics; forensic novel; forensic laboratory;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.