IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/raiswp/0216.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social Dialogue and Tripartism Paradigm at the Level of the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Agata Popescu

    (Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University of Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The problem of social dialogue and conceptual crystallization of this phenomenon was an element of maximum interest for European legal doctrine and specialized practice, especially at the level of the European Union and international bodies with attributions in the field of labor protection. Thus, the International Labor Organization proposes a working definition for social dialogue, which reflects processes and practices found in different countries and which regards social dialogue as a voluntary act of information, consultation and negotiation of social agreements between partners, as well as negotiation of collective labor contracts. More precisely, according to the definition proposed by the International Labor Organization, Social Dialogue includes any type of negotiation, consultation or the simple exchange of information between representatives of the government, employers and workers on topics of common interest regarding economic and social policies. There can be a tripartite process in which the government formally participates in the dialogue, or it can refer to bipartite relations, involving only representatives of workers and management, in which the government participates indirectly or not.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Agata Popescu, 2022. "Social Dialogue and Tripartism Paradigm at the Level of the European Union," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2023 0216, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/0216.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    trade unions; employers’ associations; social dialogue; partnerships;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.