IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/jpaper/043ry.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Quantitative Comparison Study on Patient Perceptions of Their Nurses and Physicians’ Emotional Intelligence and Quality of Care Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Raheem Young

    (Argosy University, Chicago Campus, USA)

Abstract

This study explored patients’ perceptions of nurses and physicians’ emotional intelligence (EI) and their patient quality of care practices. By understanding EI and the role it plays in nurses and physicians interactions with patients, specialized training, and other initiatives can be developed to help improve the quality of patient care provided. This was a quantitative comparison study and used a survey questionnaires developed from the TEIQUE-SF and HCAHPS surveys to gage patients’ perceptions. The instrument used to analyze patient perceptions consisted of five patient descriptive categories. Of the five descriptive categories presented, only three were used. These three patient characteristic categories were used to determine if patients viewed their nurses and doctors’ EI differently. The study found patients saw their physicians as being more emotionally intelligent than their nurses. The group with the greatest variance when answering the survey was the 75 and older group. This group rated their nurses at a 3.05, but perceived their physicians to have a 3.23 EI rating. Patients in the 45 to 54 and 65 to 74 groups perceived their nurses to be more emotionally intelligent. Even though participants perceived their physicians as being more emotionally intelligent than their nurses, no significant difference existed between nurses and physicians’ EI when all groups were tested using a .05 level of significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Raheem Young, 2018. "A Quantitative Comparison Study on Patient Perceptions of Their Nurses and Physicians’ Emotional Intelligence and Quality of Care Practices," Proceedings of the 11th International RAIS Conference, November 19-20, 2018 043RY, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:jpaper:043ry
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/043RY.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:jpaper:043ry. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.