IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sip/dpaper/09-020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

May 6th--Signals From a Very Brief But Emblematic Catastrophe on Wall Street

Author

Listed:
  • Paul David

    (Professor Emeritus in Economics, Stanford University)

Abstract

By looking closely at the underlying structural causes of the discontinuity that appeared in the behavior of the U.S. stock market at 2:40pm in the afternoon of 6th May 2010. What transpired in those 7 minutes is viewed best as a hitherto unrecognized “emergent property” of structural conditions in the U.S. national stock market that all the actors in the story collectively allowed to come into existence largely unremarked upon. Deeper significance of May 6th lies in the attention it directs to the difference between a society being able to create and deploy technical “codes” enabling enhanced connectivity for “exchange networks” and a society that also provides mutually compatible institutional regulations. It is then suggested that in view of the growing dependence of contemporary society upon on-line human-machine organizations for the performance of vital social and economic functions, continuing to focus resources and creative imagination upon accomplishing the former, while neglecting the latter form of “progress” is a recipe for embarking upon dangerous trajectories that will be characterized by rising systemic hazards of catastrophic events of the non-transient kind.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul David, 2010. "May 6th--Signals From a Very Brief But Emblematic Catastrophe on Wall Street," Discussion Papers 09-020, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, revised Jun 2010.
  • Handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:09-020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/repec/sip/09-020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    “May 6th market break”; price volatility; catastrophe theory; positive feedback; online transactions; computer-mediated communities; socio-technical system governance; symmetric regulation; regulatory by-pass; disruptive innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:09-020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Shor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cestaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.