The Economic Significance of Executive Order 13422
AbstractIn January 2007, President Bush issued an Executive Order changing the procedures for undertaking benefit-cost analyses of proposed regulations. These changes have been hailed by some as dramatic improvements while criticized by others as representing the politicization of the evaluation process. This essay analyzes the major provisions of the new Executive Order, and concludes that it is unlikely to have much of an impact on the number or quality of regulations. Only one provision—subjecting major “guidelines” documents to mandatory benefit-cost analysis—could potentially be important, but there is no systematic evidence that agencies have used guidance documents to change the stringency of regulations and bypass mandatory regulatory review. Moreover, the Executive Order leaves untouched the primary weaknesses of benefit-cost analysis as practiced by government agencies, such as absence of standardization of values for key parameters, use of inappropriate alternative regulations for comparison with a proposed regulation, and general lack of either peer review or ex post re-evaluation of regulatory impact.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research in its series Discussion Papers with number 07-017.
Date of creation: Oct 2007
Date of revision:
Bush Executive Order; business regulation; benefit-cost analysis; peer review;
Other versions of this item:
- Noll, Roger G., 2007. "The Economic Significance of Executive Order 13422," Working paper 312, Regulation2point0.
- K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
You can help add them by filling out this form.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jackie Buttice) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Jackie Buttice to update the entry or send us the correct address.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.