IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/shf/wpaper/2022014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

“Votes for Women” on the edge of urbanization

Author

Listed:
  • Pantelis Kammas

    (Athens University of Economics and Business, Patission 76, Athens 10434, Greece)

  • Vassilis Sarantides

    (Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, 9 Mappin Str, Sheffield S1 4DT, UK)

Abstract

This paper explores the existence of a gender voting gap in an economy that lies on the edge of urbanization. Building on a unique community level dataset for Greece in 1950s we investigate: (i) the impact of women’s enfranchisement on party vote shares and (ii) the role of female labour force participation on the observed gender voting gap. Our analysis provides strong evidence in favour of the “traditional gender voting gap” (women vote more conservatively compared to men) in the urbanized communities of our sample, and no gender voting differences in the rural ones. Our empirical findings also suggest that the observed gender voting gap is highly conditional upon the level of “Out of Labour Force” female population. This is because in an economic environment characterized by limited demand of female labour force, women tend to support more vigorously the sanctity of family values and therefore vote more conservatively compared to men.

Suggested Citation

  • Pantelis Kammas & Vassilis Sarantides, 2022. "“Votes for Women” on the edge of urbanization," Working Papers 2022014, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:shf:wpaper:2022014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/economics/research/serps
    File Function: First version, August 2022
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    women’s suffrage; political preferences; women’s labour market participation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:shf:wpaper:2022014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mike Crabtree (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desheuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.