IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/itepro/9610660.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards process maturity in accreditation of engineering programmes with special reference to the NBA accreditation

Author

Listed:
  • Dasharath Singh Karaulia

    (National Institute of Technical Teachers Training & Research,)

Abstract

Adoption of systems and processes that focus on improvement in design and delivery of Outcome Based Education (OBE) is a concern of many engineering institutes who either go in for or intend to apply for accreditation of engineering and technology programmes. This need emerges out from the fact that in India the engineering programme accreditation agency, the National Board of Accreditation, Delhi, does not prescribe any specific approach to process improvement methodology, and that part of process design, implementation and improvement is left to individual institutes who apply for programme accreditation. As a result institutes who have robust and mature processes in use for implementation of accreditation system are still scarce. This paper proposes an extension of business process maturity model as used in software engineering and the eMM 2.3 which is used in e-learning to ensure quality in design and implementation of accreditation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Dasharath Singh Karaulia, 2019. "Towards process maturity in accreditation of engineering programmes with special reference to the NBA accreditation," Proceedings of Teaching and Education Conferences 9610660, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:itepro:9610660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/8th-teaching-education-conference/table-of-content/detail?cid=96&iid=012&rid=10660
    File Function: First version, 2019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering Accreditation; Process Maturity; eMM 2.3; Software Engineering Maturity Model in Engineering Education; NBA Accreditation Process maturity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:itepro:9610660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.