IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/5107077.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Out with the Old, In with the New: On-line Writing Assessment of First-year University Students at the America

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Horger

    (American University of Sharjah)

Abstract

Old school writing assessment involved long hours of hand writing comments on student essays. These written comments were designed as feedback to guide students to improve their writing. However, since many instructors wrote in cursive, there were frequently issues of legibility, and sometimes students couldn?t understand the written feedback. Plus, instructors found that much of what they wrote was repetitive, making the act of assessment boring drudgery. With the advent of on-line assessment, all written feedback appears as print text, and students are more likely to read and understand their teacher?s comments. Furthermore, teachers have the added advantage of using rubrics, which clearly state the criteria used for assessment. What?s more, teachers can use desktop notes to record the most commonly written comments, and instead of re-typing and reiterating them endlessly as feedback on student essays, they can make use of copy and paste functions to improve efficiency and reduce grading time. This presentation will discuss many of the advantages of migrating to Blackboard for improved efficiency in writing assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Horger, 2017. "Out with the Old, In with the New: On-line Writing Assessment of First-year University Students at the America," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 5107077, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:5107077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/29th-international-academic-conference-rome/table-of-content/detail?cid=51&iid=012&rid=7077
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Academic WritingAssessmentTechnology;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:5107077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.