IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/5007571.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Teachers? Attitude and Beliefs to the Nature of Teaching and Learning and Relations Between the Principles of Students? Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Ia Aptarashvili

    (Tbilisi State University)

  • Tamta Darsavelidze

    (European Teaching University)

  • Natia Gaprindashvili

    (Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia)

  • Mzia Tsereteli

    (Tbilisi State university)

Abstract

Educational paradigm has changed significantly in post-soviet states and in Georgia among others. Attitude to teaching has also changed. Specifically, directive teacher-centered teaching model is replaced with student-centered model. Most of the teachers were trained in this regard. Change of paradigm caused changes in student assessment system respectively. Thereof, teachers? attitude towards teaching and learning has become the valuable research topic - what teachers? consider as the main strategies for gaining knowledge, how the knowledge is constructed, how to make student?s experience more effective, etc. It is also interesting what methods do they use for effective teaching during the instructional process and how they assess students? achievements. The data during research was collected in two directions. On the one hand, teacher?s survey was developed and on the other hand, final works conducted by teachers were analyzed according to their structures and contents. 210 teachers were involved in the research throughout the regions of Georgia. On the basis of the survey the separate aspects of the following process were evaluated:1.Teacher?s attitude to teaching and learning;2.What approaches and teaching methods are applied during the instructional process;3.How student?s knowledge is assessed, what strategies does he/she deem effective.While evaluating final works the following key criteria had been focused on: what kind of tasks do teachers use generally - complex assignments, where students need to integrate different skills or isolated set of separate tasks, which basically grounds on recognizing and memorizing the facts. Research revealed the following tendencies:The part of teachers considers that gaining knowledge generally takes place during the instructional process (47.4% of respondents), the other part thinks that independent work is crucial (52.6%). Part of teachers (30%) deems that teacher?s function is to simply provide information and facts to students; Teachers discuss student?s individual answers, retelling the lesson (very important 57.4%) and oral presentations (68.1%) as the key assessment methods of students at the lesson; On the other hand, greater part of teachers uses isolated set of tasks to assess declarative knowledge for the final works. We also applied cross tabulation analysis according to teachers? attitudes and types of final work tasks used by them. Discussing and sharing the results of the survey is interesting for professionals working in the field and for authors of the studies, to outline the advantages and disadvantages, get feedback and outline the prospects for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ia Aptarashvili & Tamta Darsavelidze & Natia Gaprindashvili & Mzia Tsereteli, 2017. "Teachers? Attitude and Beliefs to the Nature of Teaching and Learning and Relations Between the Principles of Students? Assessments," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 5007571, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:5007571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/30th-international-academic-conference-venice/table-of-content/detail?cid=50&iid=003&rid=7571
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Attitudes; Assessment; Education; Learning; Teaching; Teachers' beliefs;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:5007571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.