IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/4707267.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A live audit to enable participants to enhance their feedback practice to promote self-regulated learning

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Bavin

    (University of Central Lancashire)

  • Kelly McAteer

    (University of Central Lancashire)

Abstract

This session will provide the opportunity for reflection on individual and institutional feedback practices within the HE sector. The session allows participants to complete a live online self-assessment audit of their current feedback practices. The audit questions are based on Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick?s 7 principles (2006), and these are mapped to the stages of assessment (pre, during and post). These questions will consider the extent to which teachers are supporting students during the production of an assessment (Boud, 2000). Following the audit, the data regarding the trends of participants? feedback strengths and weaknesses will be available to provide an opportunity for group discussion. This will facilitate the group in sharing examples of good feedback practice from the HE institutions represented. The Meetoo app will allow real-time impromptu questioning to gather further qualitative responses. Finally, participants will be asked to consider whether their assessment is ?fit for purpose? and suitably aligned to the learning outcomes (Biggs and Tang, 2007). Following the session, the individual audit will be available and linked with practical suggestions for the enhancement of practice from the HEA Feedback Toolkit (2013). This will provide opportunity for participants? continued reflection and could benefit cross-programme discussions on feedback practices within institutions on their return. All data collected within this session will contribute to our ongoing research project, but will remain anonymous and confidential. Session Activities and Approximate Timings?Participants? will take part in a live online self-assessment audit based on Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick?s (2006) 7 principles of good practice to encourage self-regulated learners. The Meetoo conference app will be utilised (10-14 mins). ?Small group discussion reflecting on individual strengths and weaknesses of good feedback practice (10 mins). ?Facilitated group discussions around the trends available from the live audit (20 mins) with opportunities for smaller focus group discussion on feedback practices within the different stages of curriculum delivery.?Complete session evaluation using the Meetoo conference app (1 mins).?Data related to individual?s strengths and weaknesses highlighted through the audit will be available to individual participants to enable the completion of an action plan on return to their institutions (Day 2). ?With the permission of the participants, the audit data will contribute to our ongoing research on identifying opportunities for enhancing feedback to encourage self-regulated learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Bavin & Kelly McAteer, 2017. "A live audit to enable participants to enhance their feedback practice to promote self-regulated learning," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 4707267, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:4707267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/28th-international-academic-conference-tel-aviv-israel/table-of-content/detail?cid=47&iid=002&rid=7267
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    feedback; reflection; self-regulated learning; evaluation; assessment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:4707267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.