IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/2604211.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The forest roads? Environmental Suitability based on the Multi Criteria Evaluation (MCE) Method and the contribution to the sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Stergios Tampekis

    (Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly)

  • Fani Samara

    (Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly)

  • Stavros Sakellariou

    (Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly)

  • Athanasios Sfougaris

    (Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly)

  • Olga Christopoulou

    (Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly)

Abstract

The need for the ?Sustainable Development? and at the same time the protection and preservation of the available natural assets has become a global concern. Forests constitute vulnerable ecosystems that change at great speed. In most of the occasions the change is downgrading. The right management of natural resources is the unique solution for the achievement of sustainable development. However, sustainable management of forests must be achieved with the respect and protection of nature and landscape. Sustainable management of forest resources can only be achieved through a well-organized road network compatible with the natural environment. This paper describes the forest roads? Environmental Suitability based on the Multi Criteria Evaluation (MCE) Method. With this method we present the spatial variability mapping for the optimal forest road network and the environmental impacts evaluation that are caused to the natural environment. With the use of the MCE method, we can assess the human impact intensity to the forest ecosystem as well as the ecosystem?s absorption from the impacts that are caused from the forest roads? construction. For the human impact intensity assessment the criteria that were used are: the forest?s protection percentage, the forest road density, the applied skidding means (with either the use of tractors or the cable logging systems in timber skidding), the timber skidding direction, the traffic load and truck type, the distance between forest roads and streams, the distance between forest roads and the forest boundaries and the probability that the forest roads come through unstable soils. In addition, for the ecosystem?s absorption evaluation we used forestry, topographical and social criteria. The MCE method which is described in this study provides a powerful, useful and easy to use implement in order to combine the sustainable exploitation of natural resources and the environmental protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Stergios Tampekis & Fani Samara & Stavros Sakellariou & Athanasios Sfougaris & Olga Christopoulou, 2015. "The forest roads? Environmental Suitability based on the Multi Criteria Evaluation (MCE) Method and the contribution to the sustainable development," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2604211, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2604211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/17th-international-academic-conference-vienna/table-of-content/detail?cid=26&iid=092&rid=4211
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Suitability; forest roads? network; spatial variability; environmental impact; gis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:2604211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.