IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/1003439.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Art for Effective Goodness: A Historical Perspective and Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Kamran Khavarani

    (None)

  • Parisa Amirmostofian

    (None)

Abstract

The motivation for this research is to address a major problem in the world of visual arts, with a thundering vibration of mixed and confusing signals, and evaluate the difference between "art" and its opposite, the "personart." Being an architect and a painter for over half a century, I sense humanity is begging for an answer for a simple question: ?What is art and what is not art?? The answer to this question was clear during the grand humanistic era of the ancient Achaemenid Empire. "Effective Goodness" was the ONLY value and meaning then. For years since, tastemakers have taken advantage of a prevailing ambiguity. Artfully, they have influenced the minds of the naïve for profit making. They successfully have brainwashed the public, depriving them of the ability to choose freely. As a result, a serious debate of the status of a major controversy has ensued. Recently, Apsden [FT, WEF 2015], notes: "There have been enormous changes in the ecology of the art world in the last 20 years?.? [Apsde is right, except for the fact that 20 years is a gross underestimation.] On the one hand, consider the great Hellenic philosopher Socrates view ??meanings cannot be understood without the knowledge of their opposites. On the other hand, Bertold Brecht?s insight that ?Art is not a mirror held up to reality but a hammer with which to shape it.? Its resonance is strong, indeed. In balance, art is mastery in a craft (e.g., painting) that reflects universal values and beautifies life. That is the "creation" that is "art," and a hammer with which to shape the reality for the good, sanguine. THE contradictory to art is the ?personart,? any kind of production, merely a limited expression of the mind of a person, a group or a specific ideology, lacking mastery and void of universality. They are the "personarts," a mirror held to a limited reality, far from being an art. I propose: ?art is only that form of creation that in harmony with universal value emanate positive energy and beautifies life, otherwise it is a ?personart?.? [Khavarani, 2013] Data abundant. I analyze numerous ?personarts,? from a variety of sources, amassed for years.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamran Khavarani & Parisa Amirmostofian, 2015. "Art for Effective Goodness: A Historical Perspective and Case Study," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 1003439, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1003439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/international-academic-conference-rome/table-of-content/detail?cid=10&iid=092&rid=3439
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Art for Goodness; Bad Art; Personart;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1003439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.