IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sef/csefwp/653.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is Time an Illusion? A Bootstrap Likelihood Ratio Approach to Testing Shock Transmission Delays in DSGE Models

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Recently developed models of the business cycle exhibit a recursive timing structure, which enforces delayed propagation of exogenous shocks driving short-run dynamics. We propose a simple empirical strategy to test for the relevance of timing restrictions and ensuing shock transmission delays in general DSGE environments. Based on a bootstrap maximum likelihood estimator, our approach mitigates over-rejection concerns typically arising from conventional tests of non-linear hypotheses that exploit first-order asymptotic approximations. We showcase the empirical usefulness of the testing procedure by means of numerical simulations of a workhorse model of the monetary transmission mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Angelini & Luca Fanelli & Marco M. Sorge, 2022. "Is Time an Illusion? A Bootstrap Likelihood Ratio Approach to Testing Shock Transmission Delays in DSGE Models," CSEF Working Papers 653, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
  • Handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.csef.it/WP/wp653.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    DSGE models; Timing restrictions; Transmission delays.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • C3 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables
    • E3 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles
    • E5 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Maria Carannante (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cssalit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.