IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sef/csefwp/05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Recommendations in the Italian Labour Market: An Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Pistaferri

    (University College London, Istituto Universitario Navale, Napoli and CSEF, University of Salerno)

Abstract

In this paper I focus on one of the most peculiar features of the Italian labour market: the importance played by recommendations in the hiring of new personnel. It is usually argued that, in contrast with the experience of other industrialized countries, in Italy letters of reference are not used to signal job applicants' qualities, but only to obtain a favoured treatment in the hiring process. Anecdotal evidence suggests that firms have used those practices both to overcome rigid hiring regulation and to weaken unions' power. In the empirical analysis, conducted on data drawn from the 1991 Bank of Italy Survey of Household Income and Wealth, I show that while workers seeking through recommendations increase the chance of being hired, they also pay a ''recommendation fee'' vis-a-vis workers hired through more traditional mechanisms. I provide various explanations for these results.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Pistaferri, 1998. "Recommendations in the Italian Labour Market: An Empirical Analysis," CSEF Working Papers 05, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    • Handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.csef.it/WP/wp5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labour market imperfections; Earnings function;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Maria Carannante (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cssalit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.