IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/saq/wpaper/13-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Acceptance of Energy Transition Technologies: Theoretical Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Rossi

    (Department of Social Sciences and Economics, Sapienza University of Rome)

Abstract

The public acceptance of technologies for the energy transition is a topic that has been debated, especially in recent years, from the second decade of the 2000s until today. The reasons for this interest lie in the need for innovation in the energy supply sector due to the climate and environmental crisis that has become increasingly serious and bursting in the public and political debate. The literature explored relates to social studies, which first deal with the macro-theme of the energy and ecological transitions and then move on to the exploration in the literature of the meaning of the concept of public acceptance, which has been much debated and at the same time little clarified. Also of interest is the association between technological acceptance and risk acceptance, an aspect on which sociology has been questioning itself for a long time: we refer to Beck, Giddens and Luhmann's studies on risk, which are decidedly central to the discipline, but also to the STS strand that has focused heavily on energy technologies. Most of the proposed literature questions the usefulness of public participation processes as a tool for a more transparent acceptance by civil society and as a co-adjuvant instrument of social justice. In conclusion, implementing these practices could be an alternative regarding awareness, collaboration, information, democratisation, and empowerment. However, there needs to be a more precise reference to models that can be used on a large scale in different contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Rossi, 2023. "Public Acceptance of Energy Transition Technologies: Theoretical Perspectives," Working Papers 13/23 Classification-JEL , Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
  • Handle: RePEc:saq:wpaper:13/23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:saq:wpaper:13/23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pierluigi Montalbano (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dtrosit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.