IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rsc/rsceui/2021-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade after Trump: Can the Biden Administration Shore up the Eroding Foundations of American Leadership?

Author

Listed:
  • Craig VanGrasstek

Abstract

The results of the 2020 elections do not mean a quick or easy return to U.S. leadership in the trading system. This examination instead stresses a series of global and domestic challenges, several of which stem from long-term shifts in power and wealth. In addition to the rise of China, these include a reputational hangover from the Trump administration and the proliferation of agreements that prize targeted liberalization over nondiscrimination. The Biden administration must also contend with protectionist industries, lack of comity between the branches of government, and the two parties’ contradictory priorities on trade-related issues. The net effect is that American statesmen may continue to assign a low priority to trade, their attention is more likely to be directed toward discriminatory than multilateral initiatives, and the administration will face competing demands that complicate the negotiation and approval even of free trade agreements with selected partners.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig VanGrasstek, 2021. "Trade after Trump: Can the Biden Administration Shore up the Eroding Foundations of American Leadership?," RSCAS Working Papers 2021/17, European University Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2021/17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/69836/RSC%202021_17.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/69836
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    US trade policy; domestic politics; China; Biden administration; trade agreements;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsc:rsceui:2021/17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RSCAS web unit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rsiueit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.