IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/w2022052.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating State Regulatory Enforcement Activity From Citizen Perspective: Brief Sociological Survey Results
[Оценка Государственного Контроля С Позиции Граждан: Краткие Результаты Социологического Опроса]

Author

Listed:
  • Yuzhakov Vladimir N.

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Pokida Andrei N.

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Dobrolyubova Elena I.

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Zybunovskaya Natalia V.

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

Abstract

Enhancing state regulatory enforcement activity aimed at minimizing risks to the public values (such as health, property, personal data, environment, and cultural heritage) is one of the key priorities of the current governance agenda in Russia. Therefore, monitoring studies intended to identify public perception of the efficiency and effectiveness of regulatory enforcement activities are highly relevant. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the dynamics of the public perceptions of the regulatory authorities’ performance in 2018 – 2011. The subject of the study is regulatory enforcement activities aimed at reducing risks to the public values. The method of the study is a representative sociological survey of the public conducted in 2021. The findings of the survey are then compared to those obtained from previous rounds of the research carried out in 2018, 2019, and 2020. The results presented in the paper contain an analysis of the dynamics in public perception of the effectiveness and efficiency of the state regulatory authorities. The paper concludes that while there are some positive trends in the public perception of the safety of public values from most of the controlled risks, the overall perception of safety levels is unsatisfactory. Most respondents find that the safety of public values is insufficient. Notably, the trends in public perception vary depending on the risk type. The greatest progress is noted in ensuring safety from environmental risks and the risks associated with healthcare services. On the contrary, the public perception of personal data protection is trending downwards. Public perceptions of the regulatory authorities’ performance in processing public complaints have not changed significantly. The novelty of the study is related to the collection and generalization of empirical data on the public assessment of effectiveness and efficiency of the state regulatory authorities based on the annual sociological surveys conducted since 2018. The paper highlights the need for further improvements in state regulatory enforcement activities. In particular, the study recommends streamlining the procedures for handling citizen complaints to state regulatory enforcement bodies and taking additional measures to ensure the protection of personal data and privacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuzhakov Vladimir N. & Pokida Andrei N. & Dobrolyubova Elena I. & Zybunovskaya Natalia V., 2021. "Evaluating State Regulatory Enforcement Activity From Citizen Perspective: Brief Sociological Survey Results [Оценка Государственного Контроля С Позиции Граждан: Краткие Результаты Социологического," Working Papers w2022052, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/w2022052.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.