IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/w2022033.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Benefits and risks for Russian industries and individual enterprises from the implementation of trade and economic agreements of the CIS countries
[Выгоды И Риски Для Российских Отраслей И Отдельных Предприятий От Реализации Торгово-Экономических Соглашений Стран Снг]

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Knobel

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Yuriy Zaytsev

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Kniaz Bagdasaryan

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Marina Baeva

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Vladimir Sedalishchev

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Maria Kazaryan

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Dmitriy Kuznetsov

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Diana Mirakyan

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

  • Nikita Toropov

    (The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration)

Abstract

The CIS countries, or more broadly the former republics of the USSR, are effectively making a choice between European (EU) and Eurasian (EAEU) integration, which leads to certain benefits and risks for all CIS+ countries (including Ukraine and Georgia), especially for Russia. The cases of Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova are of primary interest. Termination of trade and economic cooperation, disruption of value chains, etc. entail a serious threat to industrial development for Russian industries and individual enterprises. Crisis phenomena such as the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, only exacerbate these trends. Great Britain’s departure from the EU (Brexit) at the end of January 2020 is also of research interest. The topics of the post-Soviet countries and their trade and economic cooperation with different countries have been studied by various authors since the collapse of the USSR. In the past ten years, there has been an increase in the activity of studying these problems, in connection with the development of the European Neighborhood Policy on the one hand and Eurasian integration on the other. Research by foreign and domestic authors can be distinguished into the following groups: 1) Analysis, including quantitative analysis, of various integration scenarios for the CIS+ countries. 2) The confrontation between European and Eurasian integrations, as well as the problems of the EAEU. 3) Problems of cooperation between Russia and the post-Soviet countries, including at the level of individual enterprises. However, the issue of assessing the risks and possible consequences at the enterprise level for the EAEU countries from the implementation of the agreements of the CIS member states remains insufficiently studied, especially taking into account the participation in value chains and the importance of industrial recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Knobel & Yuriy Zaytsev & Kniaz Bagdasaryan & Marina Baeva & Vladimir Sedalishchev & Maria Kazaryan & Dmitriy Kuznetsov & Diana Mirakyan & Nikita Toropov, 2021. "Benefits and risks for Russian industries and individual enterprises from the implementation of trade and economic agreements of the CIS countries [Выгоды И Риски Для Российских Отраслей И Отдельны," Working Papers w2022033, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/w2022033.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    trade and economic relations; regional trade agreements (RTA); CIS; EAEU; post-Soviet space;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:w2022033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.