Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Analysis of Judicial Practice in Cases of Unjustified Tax Benefits

Contents:

Author Info

  • A. Zolotareva

    ()
    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

In this paper we propose a classification of disputes on matters related to obtaining an unjustified tax benefit, revealed the typical reason for change legal classification of transactions, evaluating the degree of uniformity of judicial practice for this category. According to the results of the analysis are formulated proposals to increase the degree of certainty of the tax law by specifying the content used it evaluative categories, as well as limiting the use of coercion in when the reason for bringing the taxpayer liable are rules are unclear.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: ftp://ftp1.ane.ru/rnp/wpaper/4.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration in its series Working Papers with number 4.

as in new window
Length: 52 pages
Date of creation: Jun 2013
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:4

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 82, Vernadsky pr., 117571, Moscow
Phone: (095) 433-25-46
Fax: (095) 564-85-80
Email:
Web page: http://www.rane.ru/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: tax;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oleg Kondratenko).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.