IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/051719.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The System of Priorities in the Activities of Civil Servants of the Middle Level: Decision-Making Mechanisms, Values and Personnel Selection
[Система Приоритетов В Деятельности Государственных Служащих Среднего Уровня: Механизмы Принятия Решений, Ценностные Установки И Кадровый Отбор]

Author

Listed:
  • Atnashev, Timur (Атнашев, Тимур)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

In the system of executive authorities in Russia, the mechanisms of formation of real priorities in the activity of civil servants and decision-making mechanisms on the current "agenda" have been poorly studied, on the basis of which it is possible to diagnose three aspects of public administration: a) assess the importance of personal loyalty and mechanisms of "avoidance of responsibility Middle managers who are in the situation of choosing priorities in the context of multitasking (including legislative Acts, by-laws, job descriptions, program-target documents, presidential decrees, target indicators for assessing the effectiveness of activities, assignments of higher-level managers, interaction with representatives of other authorities, citizens' appeals, court decisions, etc.); B) a comparative analysis of the relevance and practice of combining the basic management tools in terms of three ideal-typical models of public administration: the classical rational bureaucracy, new public management, the network model of governance. To achieve the optimal balance between various management tools, an empirical analysis of administrative practices and identification of the reasons preventing their optimization are necessary. (C) Analysis of the use of the main tools of staff selection and in particular of open tenders for filling managerial positions with wide coverage in the mass media.

Suggested Citation

  • Atnashev, Timur (Атнашев, Тимур), 2017. "The System of Priorities in the Activities of Civil Servants of the Middle Level: Decision-Making Mechanisms, Values and Personnel Selection [Система Приоритетов В Деятельности Государственных Служ," Working Papers 051719, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:051719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/051719.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:051719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.