Systemic Failure of Private Banking: A Case for Public Banks
AbstractThe current crisis represents systemic failure of private banking. The private nature of banks has created opacity, and exacerbated problems of liquidity, bad assets and capital shortage. Furthermore, private banks have failed in information gathering and risk management, as well as in mediating the acquisition of vital goods by households. It is paradoxical that, confronted with such systemic failure, post-Keynesian and other heterodox economists have generally made non-systemic reform proposals. This paper draws on Marxist theory to argue that systemic change is necessary, including conversion of failed private into public banks run transparently and with democratic accountability. Public banks could more easily confront the problems of liquidity and solvency; they could also play a long-term role by providing stable flows of social credit to households as well as to small and medium enterprises. Finally, public banks could provide long-term credit redirecting mature economies toward new economic activities.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Research on Money and Finance in its series Discussion Papers with number 13.
Date of creation: 2009
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.researchonmoneyandfinance.org/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.