IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/decilo/0006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the Adequacy of Budgetary Institutions in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • A. Abdulhakeem, Kilishi,

    (University of Ilorin, Ilorin)

Abstract

In many developing countries including Nigeria budget process is faced with different challenges such that the budget could not meet the socio-economic needs of the people. Therefore, budgetary reforms were carried out to improve fiscal performance, despite that there has not been significant change in budget outcomes. This paper examines the adequacy of existing institutions in Nigeria, which is the aftermath of various fiscal reforms in the country. Content analysis of the two main sources of budget institutions (the Fiscal Responsibility Act and the 1999 Constitution) is carried out. The analysis shows: (i) a lack of comprehensive fiscal calendar stating the timeline for budget activities in a sequential order; (ii) a fragmented central budget power and responsibility which creates coordination problem; and (iii) unrestricted legislative power to amend budget. The paper concludes that there is need to review and amend relevant sections of the Fiscal Responsibility Act and the 1999 Constitution so as to resolve these inadequacies. The paper suggests that some level of hierarchical rules should be introduced such that there is a single central budget authority to coordinate, monitor and evaluate budget performance as well as enforce compliance to the fiscal rules.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Abdulhakeem, Kilishi,, 2020. "Assessing the Adequacy of Budgetary Institutions in Nigeria," Working Papers 6, Department of Economics, University of Ilorin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:decilo:0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unilorineconsworkingpapers.com.ng/download/working%20paper%2005%20(1).pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Budget; Institutions; Fiscal Responsibility Act; Adequacy; Budget Calendar;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P37 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Legal

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:decilo:0006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Akanbi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deilong.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.