T&K:n verokannustimien mahdollisia vaikutuksia suomalaisten yrityskyselyjen valossa
AbstractEvaluating the possible consequences of R&D tax incentives before their introduction is challenging, not least because the details of the system remain unknown, and because the ultimate reactions and responses of various actors involved remain uncertain. In order to shed some light on the issue, this reports studies the results of surveys targeting the representatives of Finnish firms by employing statistical and econometric tools. R&D tax incentives have become increasingly common among the industrialized countries, and the trend seems to continue. Even though R&D tax incentives and direct support are in essence substitutes, they seem to co-exist, and in a sample of OECD countries there is a (very weak) positive correlation between their relative magnitudes. The rather broad (but uneven) empirical literature on the topic provides some evidence on the complementarity between business enterprise R&D and its tax incentives : A mean estimate which has, however, a considerable variance across internationally available scholarly studies suggests that a dollar in R&D tax incen-tives stimulates one to two per cent additional R&D above the tax dollar spent. Both Finnish and international survey findings suggest that firms have a (slight) preference for R&D tax incentives over direct support, and that they would increase their innovative efforts in response to additional incentives. Growth-orientated, innovative, and/or externally collaborating firms seem to be more responsive to additional support, although there is no statistically significant difference in responsiveness by the support type.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy in its series Discussion Papers with number 1045.
Length: 29 pages
Date of creation: 2006
Date of revision:
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
- D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
- H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
- K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law
- O31 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
- O38 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kaija Hyvönen-Rajecki).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.