IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rif/briefs/96.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Finnish Fiscal Policy – A Ship Without an Anchor

Author

Listed:
  • Kuusi, Tero
  • Puonti, Päivi
  • Kangasharju, Aki

Abstract

In Finland, ceilings for the central government budget spending are used is to limit the rise of public spending during parliamentary terms. In its unprecedented, mid-term decision, the current government renounced its commitment to return to the ceilings in the years 2022 and 2023. We argue that the decision seriously undermines the credibility of the budgeting process, especially because it will coincide with a post-pandemic, economic upturn and the roll out of the EU stimulus and recovery package. The exceptional decision also implies reluctance of the government to return to the EU fiscal rules after the Covid-19 crisis. This, in turn, is problematic, as Finland lacks adequate structural reforms to speed up its economic growth and improve its fiscal sustainability. We argue that the government should recommit to the ceilings and complement the current system with a debt anchor and an expenditure rule derived from the anchor. In the future, the ceilings should also cover the entire public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuusi, Tero & Puonti, Päivi & Kangasharju, Aki, 2021. "The Finnish Fiscal Policy – A Ship Without an Anchor," ETLA Brief 96, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
  • Handle: RePEc:rif:briefs:96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.etla.fi/wp-content/uploads/ETLA-Muistio-Brief-96.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fiscal policy; Fiscal fules; Ceiling for budget expenditure; Fiscal sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H6 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt
    • H3 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents
    • H1 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rif:briefs:96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kaija Hyvönen-Rajecki (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etlaafi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.