IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-21-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

RCTs Against the Machine: Can Machine Learning Prediction Methods Recover Experimental Treatment Effects?

Author

Listed:
  • Prest, Brian C.

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Wichman, Casey

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Palmer, Karen

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

We investigate how well machine learning counterfactual prediction tools can estimate causal treatment effects. We use three prediction algorithms—XGBoost, random forests, and LASSO—to estimate treatment effects using observational data. We compare those results to causal effects from a randomized experiment for electricity customers who faced critical-peak pricing and information treatments. Our results show that each algorithm replicates the true treatment effects, even when using data from treated households only. Additionally, when using both treatment households and nonexperimental comparison households, simpler difference-in-differences methods replicate the experimental benchmark, suggesting little benefit from ML approaches over standard program evaluation methods.Click "Download" above to read the full paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Prest, Brian C. & Wichman, Casey & Palmer, Karen, 2021. "RCTs Against the Machine: Can Machine Learning Prediction Methods Recover Experimental Treatment Effects?," RFF Working Paper Series 21-30, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-21-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/3094/RCTs_Against_the_Machine.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-21-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.