This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Social Dilemmas and Public Range Management: Results from the Nevada Ranch Survey

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
G. Cornelis van Kooten
Roy Thomsen
Thomas Hobby
Alison Eagle

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Since the late 1960s, the Nevada ranch community has come under increasing pressure from environmental groups regarding their use of public lands for livestock grazing, thus increasing tension between ranchers and public land managers and potentially reducing the social capital that facilitates action and cooperation in range management. In this paper, we use responses to a survey of all public grazing permit holders in Nevada to investigate the changing relationships between ranchers and the public land agencies, and its potential implications. In particular, we investigate factors that affect ranchers’ trust in the public land agencies, and then factors that influence the nature of the relationship between ranchers and the Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service. Low levels of trust between ranchers and public managers were most significantly related to previous disagreements and the belief in a poor future for ranching. The occurrence of wildfire on grazing land contributed most signifcantly to increased disagreement between ranchers and public agencies. Finally, as a response to conflict in the ranch community, community based initiatives, such as grass banking, are examined for their potential to bring stakeholders together to realize and address common goals. Community involvement in decision making may increase levels of social capital, reduce transaction costs, and thus allow for more effective and efficient use of the range resources.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://web.uvic.ca/~kooten/REPA/WorkingPaper2003-08.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Final version, 2003
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group in its series Working Papers with number 2003-08.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 35 pages
Date of creation: 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:rep:wpaper:2003-08

Contact details of provider:
Postal: P.O. Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, B.C., V8W 2Y2
Phone: (250) 721-8532
Fax: (250) 721-6214
Web page: http://www.repa.vkooten.net
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (G.C. van Kooten).

Related research
Keywords: Institutions and social capital; effectiveness of range management policies;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
O17 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
O52 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS was sponsored from 1997 to 2002 by the Université du Québec à Montréal.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-4.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.