IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed011/654.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Horizontal versus Vertical FDI: New Empirical Evidence about U.S. Multinationals

Author

Listed:
  • Veronica Rappoport

    (Columbia Business School)

  • Kim J. Ruhl

    (Stern School of Business, NYU)

  • Natalia Ramondo

    (Arizona State University)

Abstract

We document new facts about the behavior of U.S. multinational firms and their affiliates regarding the product space in which they operate, the nature of their input-output relationships, and intra-firm trade flows. We use confidential data on U.S. multinational firms from the Bureau of Economic Analysis for the year 1999. First, 42% of affiliates operate in the same 4-digit industry as their parent while of the remaining 58%, 15% operate in an upstream industry from their parents. In the manufacturing sector, while 54% of affiliates list the same primary industry as their parents, only 14% of affiliates list as primary industry the secondary industry of the parent. Second, 77% of affiliates ship nothing to their parents; In fact, more than 80% of affiliate sales are directed to unaffiliated parties in the market of operation. 65% of affiliates do not receive any shipments from their parents. Imports from parents represent 9% of affiliate sales, equally split between imports of goods for further processing and goods for resale. Our findings are consistent with those in Hortacsu and Syverson (2010) regarding domestic multi-plant firms. Our results suggest that firms' boundaries are determined by their ability to transfer capabilities (such as managerial ability) rather than goods within the firm. In the same spirit, our ï¬ndings suggest that multinational enterprises are more often "horizontal" rather than "vertical".

Suggested Citation

  • Veronica Rappoport & Kim J. Ruhl & Natalia Ramondo, 2011. "Horizontal versus Vertical FDI: New Empirical Evidence about U.S. Multinationals," 2011 Meeting Papers 654, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed011:654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://red-files-public.s3.amazonaws.com/meetpapers/2011/paper_654.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed011:654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.