Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Reevaluating the Evidence on Trade and Productivity

Contents:

Author Info

  • Kim J. Ruhl

    ()
    (Economics University of Texas Austin)

Abstract

Researchers have estimated productivity changes surrounding trade liberalization for different countries, using different techniques, and have generally reached the conclusion that gains are positive. In this paper we study how different techniques influence the quantitative results by calculating productivity gains for Chile following the liberalization of the 1970s and 1980s using several methods used in the literature and incorporating new cost and market structures. To do this, we specify and estimate production functions for firms using methods suggested by Olley and Pakes (1996), Levinsohn and Petrin (2003), and Cooper, Haltiwanger, and Willis (2006). We modify these techniques to include decisions on exporting and exit and to allow for convex and nonconvex forms of labor and capital adjustment costs. Additionally, we allow for nontraded goods sectors – which are frequently ignored in this literature – to asses the differential impact of opening to trade on traded and nontraded good sectors. In agreement with other studies, we find aggregate productivity gains are driven mostly by changes in the composition of plants. In addition, we find that nonconvex adjustment costs are crucial to replicating the firm level data on exporting and factor demands and that there are strong interactions between the traded and nontraded good sectors. In our preferred specification, which allows for this richer structure, we find that plant level productivity grows more than that found in other studies.

Download Info

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Society for Economic Dynamics in its series 2006 Meeting Papers with number 770.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 03 Dec 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:red:sed006:770

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Society for Economic Dynamics Christian Zimmermann Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis PO Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
Fax: 1-314-444-8731
Email:
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/society.htm
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: trade liberalization; productivity; dynamic structural estimation;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed006:770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.