IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed004/394.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Demand Reduction and Preemptive Bidding in License Auctions

Author

Listed:
  • Randolph Sloof
  • Jacob K. Goeree
  • Theo Offerman

Abstract

Multi-license ascending auctions have been criticized because they allow bidders to reduce their demand and split the market at low prices. At the same time, it has been argued that the ascending auction is a suitable format for a seller who wants to exploit preemptive motives. Incumbent firms may bid above their use values in a coordinated attempt to keep the weak entrant(s) out of the market. This process may boost revenue. In this paper, we look at environments where demand reduction and preemptive bidding are both supported as equilibrium of the ascending auction. In a series of experiments, we compare the performance of the ascending auction with the first-price auction. We observe many instances of strategic demand reduction in the ascending auction, even when entry by the newcomer leads to strong negative effects for the incumbents. As a result, the ascending auction is outperformed by the first-price auction, both in terms of revenue and in terms of efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Randolph Sloof & Jacob K. Goeree & Theo Offerman, 2004. "Demand Reduction and Preemptive Bidding in License Auctions," 2004 Meeting Papers 394, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  • Handle: RePEc:red:sed004:394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goeree, Jacob K. & Offerman, Theo & Schram, Arthur, 2006. "Using first-price auctions to sell heterogeneous licenses," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 555-581, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    auctions; demand reduction; preemptive bidding; experiment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed004:394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.