IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qld/uq2004/642.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Repeated quizzing of building block mathematics concepts to improve grades in economics

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Leggett

    (School of Education, The University of Queensland)

  • Bryan Morgan

    (School of Economics, The University of Queensland)

  • Kam Ki Tang

    (School of Economics, The University of Queensland)

Abstract

Modern economics courses require a high level of mathematical proficiency, and a lack of such proficiency may reduce the performance of economics students or lead students to avoid economics courses altogether. In the experiment described in this study, we sought to improve economics students’ mathematical skills, and in turn their grades, by repeatedly quizzing them on building block concepts. We analysed data from four semesters of a first-year mathematics course. In the earlier two semesters, under an old quizzing approach, students were quizzed five times, but no concept appeared on more than one quiz. In the last two semesters, under the new quizzing approach, important basic concepts appearedrepeatedly across several quizzes. Results showed that performance with repeated concepts improved across quizzes and the new quizzing approach was associated with slightly higher final exam scores. Scores on the mid-semester exams, which occurred before most quizzes, were not consistently associated with the quizzing approach (and therefore the semesters), helping to rule out cohort effects and some other potential alternative explanations for the improvement in final exam scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Leggett & Bryan Morgan & Kam Ki Tang, 2021. "Repeated quizzing of building block mathematics concepts to improve grades in economics," Discussion Papers Series 642, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
  • Handle: RePEc:qld:uq2004:642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.uq.edu.au/files/39736/642.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qld:uq2004:642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SOE IT (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decuqau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.