IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/wpaper/747.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Fisher Equation Controversy: A Reconciliation of Contradictory Results

Author

Listed:
  • Jha, R.
  • Sahu, A.P.

Abstract

This paper re-examines the alternative theoretical predictions in the Fischer equation literature. Theoretical predictions about the response of nominal interest rates to inflation expectations ranges from a partial to complete and more-than-complete adjustment of the nominal interest rate to anticipated inflation. Using a neoclassical monetary growth model, this study demonstrates how Mundell-Tobin, Fischer, Darby-Feldstein, Neilsen-Gandolfi, and Summers effects hold as special cases under specific assumptions about the parameter values of the model; thus suggesting that the magnitude of the response of the nominal interest rate to expected inflation depends on the empirical values of the critical parameters involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Jha, R. & Sahu, A.P., 1989. "The Fisher Equation Controversy: A Reconciliation of Contradictory Results," Working Paper 747, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    • Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.