IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/psi/resdis/25.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

New Zealand Working For Families programme: Literature review of evaluation evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Evans
  • Ivana La Valle
  • Genevieve Knight

Abstract

In 2005, the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) commissioned research to review international evaluation methodology and literature to help in the preparation of evaluation of the Working for Families (WFF) policy, introduced in 2004 to assist working low- and middle-income families in New Zealand. The results of the study are in two parts: Working for Families: Methodological considerations in evaluating the programme and Working for Families: Literature review of evaluation evidence. This first part, the literature review, reviews international literature, comparing the economic impact of WFF with those of welfare reforms elsewhere. It introduces the central issues within the New Zealand and WFF context using a combination of cross-national comparisons and an intensive country or programme literature review. This provides a good balance between depth and coverage and enables a consistent method of review. Research findings are aimed at government social researchers and will enable evaluation to be carried out on WFF based on a sound understanding of current international evidence and benchmarking.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Evans & Ivana La Valle & Genevieve Knight, 2007. "New Zealand Working For Families programme: Literature review of evaluation evidence," PSI Research Discussion Series 25, Policy Studies Institute, UK.
    • Handle: RePEc:psi:resdis:25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.psi.org.uk/pdf/rdp/rdp-25-wff-lit-review.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:psi:resdis:25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rob Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/psiiiuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.