Author
Listed:
- Noreen Goldman
(Princeton University)
- Cassio M. Turra
(Princeton University)
- Dana A. Glei
(University of California, Berkeley)
- Christopher L. Seplaki
(Johns Hopkins University)
- Yu-Hsuan Lin
(Bureau of Health Promotion, Ministry of Health, Taiwan)
Abstract
Few studies focus on preclinical warning signs associated with mortality. In this paper, we investigate associations between all-cause mortality and two clusters of biological risk factors: 1) standard clinical measures related to cardiovascular disease and metabolic function; and 2) nontraditional measures pertaining to hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, sympathetic nervous system activity and inflammatory response. Data come from the 2000 Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study, a national sample of Taiwanese ages 54 and older: 1497 persons were interviewed in their homes and 1023 participated in a hospital examination. The analysis is based on 927 respondents with complete information. Logistic regression models describe the association between biomarkers and the three-year probability of dying. Although both groups of biomarkers are significantly associated with mortality, a model with nontraditional biomarkers has better explanatory and discriminatory power than one with clinical measures. The association between the nontraditional measures and mortality remains strong after adjustment for the clinical markers, suggesting that the physiological effects of the nontraditional biomarkers are broader than those captured by the cardiovascular and metabolic system measures included here. Nontraditional markers are likely to provide early warning signs of deteriorating health and function beyond what can be learned from conventional markers. Our findings are consistent with recent studies that 1) demonstrate the importance of neuroendocrine and immune system markers for survival, and 2) indicate that standard clinical variables are less predictive of mortality in older than in younger populations.
Suggested Citation
Noreen Goldman & Cassio M. Turra & Dana A. Glei & Christopher L. Seplaki & Yu-Hsuan Lin, 2006.
"Predicting Mortality from Standard and Nontraditional Biomarkers,"
Working Papers
288, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Office of Population Research..
Handle:
RePEc:pri:opopre:opr0601.pdf
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:opopre:opr0601.pdf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bobray Bordelon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/opprius.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.