IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pre/wpaper/201552.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Forecasting Accuracy Evaluation of Tourist Arrivals: Evidence from Parametric and Non-Parametric Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Hossein Hassani

    (Statistical Research Centre, Bournemouth University, 89 Holdenhurst Road, Bournemouth BH8 8EB, UK)

  • Emmanuel Sirimal Silva

    (Statistical Research Centre, Bournemouth University, 89 Holdenhurst Road, Bournemouth BH8 8EB, UK)

  • Nikolaos Antonakakis

    (Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics, Institute for International Economics, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria and University of Portsmouth, Economics and Finance Subject Group, Portsmouth Business School, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3DE, United Kingdom and Johannes Kepler University, Department of Economics, Altenbergerstrae 69, Linz, 4040, Austria)

  • George Filis

    (Bournemouth University, Accounting, Finance and Economics Department, 89 Holdenhurst Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH8 8EB, United Kingdom)

  • Rangan Gupta

    (Department of Economics, University of Pretoria)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the use of several parametric and nonparametric forecasting techniques for predicting tourism demand in selected European countries. ARIMA, Exponential Smoothing (ETS), Neural Networks (NN), Trigonometric Box-Cox ARMA Trend Seasonal (TBATS), Fractionalized ARIMA (ARFIMA) and both Singular Spectrum Analysis algorithms, i.e. recurrent SSA (SSA-R) and vector SSA (SSA-V), are adopted to forecast tourist arrivals in Germany, Greece, Spain, Cyprus, Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Sweden and United Kingdom. This paper not only marks the introductory application of the TBATS model for tourism demand forecasting, but also marks the first instance in which the SSA-R model is effectively utilized for forecasting tourist arrivals. The data is tested rigorously for normality, seasonal unit roots and break points whilst the out-of-sample forecasts are tested for statistical significance. Our findings show that no single model can provide the best forecasts for any of the countries considered here in the short-, medium- and long-run. Moreover, forecasts from NN and ARFIMA models provide the least accurate predictions for European tourist arrivals, yet interestingly ARFIMA forecasts are better than the powerful NN model. SSA-R, SSA-V, ARIMA and TBATS are found to be viable options for modelling European tourist arrivals based on the most number of times a given model outperforms the competing models in the above order. The results enable forecasters to choose the most suitable model (from those evaluated here) based on the country and horizon for forecasting tourism demand. Should a single model be of interest, then, across all selected countries and horizons the SSA-R model is found to be the most efficient based on lowest overall forecasting error.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossein Hassani & Emmanuel Sirimal Silva & Nikolaos Antonakakis & George Filis & Rangan Gupta, 2015. "Forecasting Accuracy Evaluation of Tourist Arrivals: Evidence from Parametric and Non-Parametric Techniques," Working Papers 201552, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:pre:wpaper:201552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yılmaz, Engin, 2015. "Forecasting tourist arrivals to Turkey," MPRA Paper 68616, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tourist arrivals; Tourism demand; Forecasting; Singular Spectrum Analysis; ARIMA; Exponential Smoothing; Neural Networks; TBATS; ARFIMA.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pre:wpaper:201552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rangan Gupta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decupza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.