This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Zdroje Nebo Podněty Růstu?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Kyn, Oldrich

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This article was published in the Czech Journal “Plánované hospodářství” in 1967. This was the time of rapid changes both in the Czechoslovak economic and political theory as well as in actual economic and political systems that culminated in the “Prague Spring” of 1968. These changes were preceded and in the considerable degree also stimulated by the completely unexpected economic recession of the first half of 1960’s. The economy that was by Marxist theory and Communist propaganda supposed to grow in the fast, uninterrupted and well balanced way suddenly stopped growing and in one year even slightly declined. There appeared two conflicting views about the way out from the recession. The orthodox Marxists and especially the planners from the Central Planning Office argued that the only way out is by significant increase of investment that would generate additional productive capacity. Some even argued that because the technical progress is capital intensive, the uninterrupted growth requires permanently increasing share of investment in the National Income. The opposite view saw the solution in the abolition of the Soviet-type command planning and return to the market economic system. This paper uses theories of economic growth and references to the empirical studies that unquestionably demonstrated the mostly capital-saving nature of technological progress in the 20th century, to show, that the further increases of already very high share of investment in National income is not necessary and would be in fact harmful. The further slowing down of the growth of per capita consumption that would be necessary if the first strategy was adopted would undermine the incentives for increasing the labor productivity and for choice of capital-saving technologies.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/22/
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 22.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 1967
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in Plánované hospodářství, No. 4..Vol. XX(1967): pp. 70-80
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:22

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).

Related research
Keywords: Socialism Central Planning Czechoslovak Economic Reform Prague Spring Recession Rate of Growth Share of Investment Capital-Output Coefficient Technical Progress Capital-Saving Technology Incentives National Income Consumption Investment

Find related papers by JEL classification:
P2 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Systems and Transition Economies
O4 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can use IDEAS to provide links to papers and articles in your course syllabus.

This page was last updated on 2008-11-17.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.