IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/21107.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Green benches: What can the People's Republic of China learn from environment courts of other countries?

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Tun
  • Wang, Canfa
  • Chen, Yi
  • Camacho, Trisa
  • Lin, Fen

Abstract

The rapid economic growth of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) over the last 30 years has generated many environmental problems and a concomitant rise in the number of environmental disputes. Until 1989, legal cases arising from these disputes were usually heard in the people’s courts of general jurisdiction. In that year, however, the development of the environment court system accelerated, leading to the creation of 11 such courts for pilot cases, a sign of the high priority the PRC has given to environmental protection over the past two decades. This paper examines the effectiveness of environment courts in the PRC and elsewhere, so that the lessons learned can be applied in the PRC and in other developing countries. It also recommends ways to promote environmental justice in the PRC, given that the 11 environment courts are no longer enough to handle the rapidly increasing caseload throughout the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Tun & Wang, Canfa & Chen, Yi & Camacho, Trisa & Lin, Fen, 2009. "Green benches: What can the People's Republic of China learn from environment courts of other countries?," MPRA Paper 21107, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:21107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21107/1/MPRA_paper_21107.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    environment courts; China; environmental laws; environmental disputes; environmental cases; green judges;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • K3 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:21107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.